The EU General Court has upheld a decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO finding that there was a likelihood of confusion between the figurative mark NUME and the earlier word mark NUMEDERM for certain goods in Classes 5, 29 and 30.
In Rubik’s Brand Ltd v EUIPO, the EU General Court has confirmed the cancellation of an EU trademark consisting of the shape of the well-known Rubik’s Cube puzzle in the latest decision in the long-running battle between Rubik’s Brand and Simba Toys.
In Kalypso Media Group GmbH v EUIPO, the EU General Court has confirmed that there was a likelihood of confusion between the mark DUNGEONS and the earlier mark DUNGEONS & DRAGONS for games and computer games.
In McDreams Hotel GmbH v EUIPO, American fast food giant McDonald's has successfully enforced its rights against a EU trademark application incorporating the prefix ‘Mc’ on the basis of its extensive reputation.
A new study looking at how AI is used by IP offices warns that “the seductive appeal of the all-seeing algorithm should be resisted” due to current limitations.
The EU General Court has confirmed that there was a likelihood of confusion between Puma SE’s mark MG PUMA and Destilerias MG SL’s earlier mark GINMG for goods in Class 33.
In Société des Produits Nestlé SA v EUIPO, the EU General Court has added to the case law concerning the admissibility of new evidence submitted for the first time before the boards of appeal.
The General Court has today confirmed the cancellation of the EU trademark consisting of the shape of the Rubik’s Cube, finding that the essential characteristics of the shape are necessary to obtain a technical result; therefore it could not be registered.
In Vafo Praha sro v EUIPO, the EU General Court has annulled a decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO finding that there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks MEATLOVE and CARNILOVE.
In a case involving the mark #DARFERDAS?, the Court of Justice of the European Union has held that, when examining the distinctive character of a mark, all the likely types of use must be taken into account.
The EU General Court has overturned the denial of Volvo’s opposition against the registration of the mark V-WHEELS, holding that the EUIPO had incorrectly found that the relevant marks were dissimilar for the purposes of Article 8(5) of EU Regulation 2017/1001.
The EU General Court has upheld a decision of the EUIPO finding that there was no likelihood of confusion between IRF’s figurative mark MEDIWELL and earlier WELL AND WELL marks belonging to Pharmadom.
The EU General Court has confirmed the cancellation of Porsche’s registered Community design for the latest iteration of its 911 model for lack of individual character.
In WhiteWave Services Inc v EUIPO, the General Court has confirmed the importance of word elements in composite trademarks.
In Koton v EUIPO, which concerned the absolute ground for invalidity under Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009, the Court of Justice of the European Union has set aside the General Court’s judgment on the ground that the latter had misread the decision in Lindt.