Search results

Selected filters:

Portfolio Management

Article type



94 results found for your search

Sort options
01 March 2018

Franchising: a global guide to brand monetisation

In the first of a two-part series, we outline the legislative framework for franchising in nine jurisdictions across Asia and South America.

31 January 2018

Polo/Lauren Company fails to invalidate 'polo player' mark

The Polo/Lauren Company has failed to invalidate the Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club's registration for a composite mark containing the word 'polo' and the device of a polo player.

14 December 2017

International applications at an all-time high as Asia and Africa experience sharp rise in trademark filings

WIPO has released its latest report into global IP activity, revealing a significant rise in  filing activity. Most of the growth can be attributed to China’s continued domination.

03 October 2017

Apple fails in its opposition to MI PAD

Apple Inc opposed Xiaomi Singapore Pte Ltd's application to register the trademark MI PAD in Classes 9 and 38. The registrar examined the application pursuant to the Trademarks Act, finding that the mark was aurally and visually dissimilar to Apple’s IPAD mark and that there was no likelihood of confusion.

08 September 2017

MYSTERY SET mark revoked for watches

Van Cleef & Arpels SA, which supplied fine jewellery and luxury watches, was the proprietor of the MYSTERY SET trademark in Class 14 registered for “jewellery, watches”. FMTM Distribution Ltd sought to revoke the mark on the grounds that it had not been put to genuine use and that the mark was descriptive.

10 July 2017

Declaration of invalidation fails over BIG BOX mark

Claims that the the mark BIG BOX should be declared invalid ab initio under Sections 7(1)(b) (c) and (d) of the Trademarks Act have failed, after the IP adjudicator considered that the applicant had not succeeded in satisfying the burden of establishing one of the three grounds of invalidation.

02 June 2017

CAESAR mark successfully blocks application for Caesarstone

In 2016 Caesarstone appealed the decision of the principal assistant registrar to allow an opposition filed by Ceramiche Caesar against an application for its house mark. The High Court upheld the appeal, but the Court of Appeal disagreed with the High Court’s rulings. This decision clarifies that, notwithstanding the differences in length and structure, the distinctive and dominant component of a mark would still be the core consideration in determining similarity.

11 January 2017

Nestlé loses appeal over Kit Kat shape marks

The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision that Nestlé’s two-fingered and four-fingered KIT KAT shape marks lack inherent distinctiveness as they do not represent a significant departure from the norms of chocolate confectionery. The decision emphasises the fact that, unless there is evidence to prove that consumers are accustomed to recognising the shape of a product as a badge of trade origin, even evidence of substantial use is unlikely to assist.

05 January 2017

Bentley Motors wins case on grounds of non-use

A registrar has allowed Bentley Motor’s application for revocation of Aucera’s BENTLEY mark to succeed on the grounds of non-use. The application was successful largely due to the lack of specificity of the evidence provided by Aucera. The case highlights that proprietors in Singapore should use their registered trademark, otherwise it will be open to challenge by another party.

07 November 2016

Crocodile’s former licensee held liable for damages

The IP court in Taiwan has ruled that Ya-E International, a former licensee of Crocodile International, should pay damages of NT$2,805,222 (US$95,416) for trademark infringement and breach of a trademark licence agreement.

06 May 2016

No confusion between Polo Ralph Lauren and United States Polo Association

In Polo/Lauren Company LP v United States Polo Association, the Singapore High Court has upheld a decision of the Trademark Registry adjudicator who had refused an opposition by Polo Ralph Lauren against a trademark application by United States Polo Association.

27 October 2015

Formula One Licensing fails to prevent registration of F1H20 mark

In Formula One Licensing BV v Idea Marketing SA, the High Court has dismissed Formula One Licensing BV’s case on all grounds and allowed Idea Marketing SA’s application for the mark F1H20 to proceed to registration. Among other things, the court held that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that Formula One Licensing had acquired goodwill in the F1 mark prior to the date of application of the F1H20 mark.

14 October 2015

Court of Appeal upholds decision to invalidate MANCHESTER cigarette mark

In Global Tobacco Manufacturers v Al Mahamid, the Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against the order of the High Court to invalidate the figurative mark MANCHESTER for cigarettes based on a likelihood of confusion with the earlier figurative mark MANCHESTER, which also covered cigarettes. Among other things, the Court of Appeal held that actual confusion is not a necessary element of the cause of action.

15 September 2015

Owner of ANGRY BIRDS fails to prevent registration of ANGRY BITE for Class 30 goods

In Rovio Entertainment Ltd v Kimanis Food Industries Sdn Bhd, the High Court has upheld a decision of the registrar in which the latter had dismissed an opposition by Rovio, the owner of the ANGRY BIRDS mark, against the registration of the figurative mark ANGRY BITE in Class 30. One of the issues before the court was whether two earlier registered marks may be combined into a composite whole for the purposes of comparison with the opposed mark.

22 July 2015

Converse fails to prevent registration of star device mark for shoes

The Intellectual Property Office has dismissed Converse Inc’s opposition to the registration of the mark CLASSIC JAZZ STAR (and star device) in Class 25. Among other things, the office found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the mark applied for and Converse’s mark CONVERSE ALL STAR (and star device).