Domain name dispute resolution policies compared
Most domain name dispute resolution policies share common features,
in particular the three-part test of confusing similarity, bad faith and legitimate
interest. Although only a handful of decisions have been issued to date under
Canada's policy, Sheldon Burshtein and Ian Hay of Blake Cassels & Graydon
LLP find that the new-comer holds significant differences from the UDRP and
the policies of Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our weekly newsletter and access two of our subscriber-only articles per month.
Register now
Subscribe and start reading now
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the WTR experts.
Subscribe now