General Court: mere fact that goods are different makes it possible to rule out any likelihood of confusion
In Grendene SA v EUIPO, the General Court has confirmed that there was no likelihood of confusion between the mark HIPANEMA for jewellery and earlier IPANEMA marks for footwear.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our weekly newsletter and access two of our subscriber-only articles per month.
Subscribe and start reading now
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the WTR experts.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10