Eighth Circuit: phonetically identical description of competing dog bags does not necessarily cause confusion
United States of America
Legal updates: case law analysis and intelligence
In a case involving competitors in the dog bag market, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has affirmed a summary judgment finding that no evidence had been presented from which a jury could infer that consumers were likely to be confused.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our weekly newsletter and access two of our subscriber-only articles per month.
Register now
Subscribe and start reading now
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the WTR experts.
Subscribe now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10