Donburi or dog’s dinner? Zuma versus Dine in with Zuma
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court has found that the reputation of a high-end Japanese restaurant’s trademarks would be tarnished by use of the same name on dog food, regardless of the latter's human-grade ingredients, and that the own name defence could not succeed when deployed by a dog. The case demonstrates how the courts will readily provide protection where the substantial reputation enjoyed by a high-end brand is affected by a defendant’s use in a rather different arena.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our weekly newsletter and access two of our subscriber-only articles per month.
Subscribe and start reading now
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the WTR experts.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10