The CLIPPER case: Beijing High Court finds that 3D mark containing distinctive word element is non-distinctive
The incoherent methodology adopted by the Beijing High Court and the CNIPA could further complicate the prosecution landscape for 3D marks in China.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our newsletter and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Subscribe and start reading now
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the WTR experts.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10