Registry updates Work Manual on Absolute Grounds for Refusal
During the examination stage, where it was appropriate for examiners "to raise a question on their own initiative if the application has information or omissions that raise questions about the applicant’s honest intentions", it is now appropriate for "the registry to raise an objection if the circumstances of the application give rise to a reasonable suspicion as to the applicant’s entitlement to the mark or the honesty of his intentions".
For example, where, previously, an examiner could "ask the applicant to provide material" to show that it was entitled to apply for registration (eg, a written endorsement from the owner of the relevant trademark), he or she can now "raise an objection on the ground that the application is made in bad faith and the applicant may overcome the objection by providing material" showing entitlement to apply for registration in the following cases:
- if an applied-for mark is generally known to be the trademark of a particular company;
- if the applicant simultaneously files a number of applications for different marks, one of which is generally known to be the trademark of a particular company, and the applicant has not submitted information proving a relationship between itself and the owner of the mark; or
- the mark incorporates the name or image of a well-known person without that person's agreement.
Where the circumstances of the application give rise to a reasonable suspicion as to the applicant’s entitlement to the mark or the honesty of its intentions, examiners have a duty to raise an objection based on bad faith. Examiners are no longer left simply to raise a question on their own initiative if the application contains information or makes omissions as to the applicant’s honest intentions.
Lily Cheung, Wilkinson & Grist, Hong Kong
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10