General Court provides guidance on revocation of EUTMs for non-use
In IR v EUIPO, the General Court has upheld a EUIPO decision granting Pirelli’s application for the revocation of the mark POPCHRONO on the ground of non-use. The decision provides guidance on several issues relating to the revocation of EUTMs under Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation 207/2009. The mark owner had put forward several ‘imaginative’ arguments, such as Pirelli’s alleged anti-competitive behaviour and the EUIPO’s alleged failure to invite the parties to settle.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our newsletter and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10