Federal Court finds that SIGNATURE marks for wine are not deceptively similar
In Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd v Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd, Samuel Smith has failed in its attempt to stop Pernod Ricard from selling wine bearing the BAROSSA SIGNATURE mark on the basis that it infringed its THE SIGNATURE trademark registration. The case highlights that individual descriptive words can function as a trademark when combined together, and that a sub-brand, when used in conjunction with a house mark, can still function as a separate trademark.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our newsletter and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Register now
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
Subscribe now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10