AVIV v AVIVE: High Court rejects expanded approach to whether goods can be considered complementary
Legal updates: case law analysis and intelligence
Goods or services should have a similar nature, method of use and purpose; an overlapping user base will be insufficient to establish complementarity.
To read more
Register for limited access
Register to receive our newsletter and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10