Search results - found 10,554
In The Coca-Cola Company v Glacier Water Industries the High Court of Delhi has issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Glacier Water Industries from using Coca-Cola’s KINLEY mark and passing off its goods as those of Coca-Cola. In doing so, the court confirmed the protection afforded to well-known trademarks in India.
Following its accession to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial and Intellectual Property, Kuwait has recently introduced a new e-filing system for trademark applications. This update examines how Kuwait is modernising its trademark prosecution process in line with international best practices.
In Giro Travel Company v Andreas Stihl AG, the Second Board of Appeal of the EUIPO has found that a colour mark consisting of the colours orange and grey for chainsaws was invalid. The decision confirms that, despite the change in 2015 to remove the ‘graphic representation’ requirement, the Sieckmann criteria remain in play.
The Patent and Trademark Office has ordered the cancellation of a 3D trademark representing Crocs Inc's famous clog shoe in Classes 10 and 25. Among other things, the office found that the elements making up the mark were aesthetically functional and could not be exclusively appropriated.
Lucasfilm trademark scuffle, Breaking Bad beer battle and Tanzania launches counterfeit campaign: news round-up
In our latest round-up, we look at how half of cybercrime revenues come from illicit online marketplaces, the Brexit-related trademark ruffling feathers, how cryptocoin names are often inspired by movies and books, and why Lucasfilm is being sued for trademark infringement.
Birkenstock's ‘patterned sole’ UK trademark has been held to be invalid for lack of distinctiveness. This case reaffirms the difficulty in defending a sub-brand (or unconventional) trademark and provides further case law in support of the position held in Nestle v Cadbury.
In a landmark decision, the Court of Appeals has held that the level of attention of the target consumers plays a significant role in the assessment of the likelihood of confusion. The court concluded that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trademarks A10.COM and A-101, as the goods and services in Classes 9 and 41 target cautious and selective consumers.
The Federal Administrative Court has held that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trademarks SIGNIFOR and SIGNASOL for pharmaceutical preparations in Class 5 despite finding that the goods were similar, that the marks were similar from a phonetic and visual point of view and that there was a certain conceptual similarity between them.
Rospatent has announced that a faster process for the expedited examination of trademarks and patents is now available. The new timeframe provides significant benefits for applicants, but brand owners must be aware of this change when building their strategies against potentially infringing applications.
Kit Kat blow, Comey trademark abandoned, and Russian IP office pledges blockchain support: news round-up
In our latest round-up, we look at the advocate general’s latest Kit Kat opinion, INTA’s call for more research on illicit trade, Liverpool Football Club embroiled in a dispute, strong start for the ‘.app’ new gTLD, and advice on building a fashion retail brand in 2018.
In Makemytrip v Orbit, travel company MakeMyTrip sought to restrain use of the mark GETMYTRIP by competitor Orbit on the basis of its registered rights in the mark MAKEMYTRIP. The High Court of Delhi found, among other things, that MakeMyTrip was guilty of suppression of facts, and set aside the ex parte interim injunction granted in its favour.
Despite court's non-infringement ruling, TTAB affirms Section 2(d) refusal of MOAB for automobiles and parts
The TTAB has affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark MOAB for motor vehicles, finding it likely to cause confusion with the mark MOAB INDUSTRIES for automotive conversion services. While the application was pending, a federal court ruled in favour of the applicant in a trademark infringement and unfair competition action brought by the registrant, but the TTAB found that the ruling had no estoppel effect on the determination of this ex parte appeal.
“Generic drug-making is a fast-track business”: Sandoz trademark head reveals approach to IP management
For the latest in World Trademark Review’s series of interviews with WTR 300-listed corporate counsel, we met up with David Lossignol, INTA’s president-elect and global head of trademarks for Sandoz. He explained how he overcomes the challenges of managing pharmaceutical brand rights across many jurisdictions and addressed the growing threat of brand restrictions.
The Court of Appeal has upheld a decision of the Civil IP Court in which the latter assessed the similarity between two trademarks by taking into account generic words, which would not be normally considered in the examination of the likelihood of confusion. The decision also deals with the issue of how, and under which conditions, an earlier trademark may provide vested rights to its owner.
Qatar is currently seeking to reinforce its IP protection regime by providing a stronger legal basis for the protection of customer rights, in addition to improving and organising administrative filing systems. This update examines recent trademark-related developments in the country which reflect the approach taken by the government to achieve these goals.
General Court: relevant public's perception of mark on filing date is crucial to assess absolute grounds for refusal
In Safe Skies LLC v EUIPO the General Court has upheld a decision of the EUIPO, rejecting an application for a declaration of invalidity of the mark TSA LOCK. The court found that the applicant had not established that, at the relevant time, the relevant public had associated the capital letters ‘TSA’ with the Transportation Security Administration.
Groundbreaking paper suggests neuroscience could transform trademark strategies both inside and outside the courtroom
A new research paper foresees a future in which brain scans fundamentally transform the current understanding of trademarks. The paper, released last month, predicts that so-called 'neuromarks' a neural map unique to each brand could become crucial sources of evidence in trademark disputes and provide a biological baseline for the basic questions at the heart of trademark law.
Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are interfaces that allow users to interact and exchange information with electronic devices. Since GUIs are increasingly key to success in the market for software products, their protection has become more important than ever.
The decision of the registrar of trademarks, in which the application for ALEXANDER in Classes 18, 20 and 25 in the name of CKL Holdings NV was refused on the grounds of bad faith, has been upheld. The decision emphasises that the wider conduct of the applicant could be relevant to the assessment of whether an application was filed in bad faith.
The Board of Appeal has dismissed an opposition filed by the owner of the figurative mark SKYR in Class 29 against the registration of the figurative mark SKYR BALTAIS in the same class. Among other things, the board found that Estonian consumers would understand the word ‘Skyr’ as designating an Icelandic dairy product and that there were no alternatives for designating that product.
Register for more free content
- Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
- Receive the editor's weekly review by email