The Supreme Court of Canada has issued a landmark decision in Google, Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc (2017 SCC 34), confirming that Canadian courts have jurisdiction to issue interlocutory injunctions against a party’s activities that extend beyond Canada and have global reach. The court noted that the “Internet has no borders – its natural habitat is global” and, as a consequence, found that any remedy also needs to be global. In the majority opinion, Google was the “determinative player in allowing the harm [to Equustek] to occur”. Further, and in comparison, the harm to Google would be “minimal to non-existent”. The court saw the injunction as the “only effective way to mitigate the harm to Equustek”.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is one of my favourite conference organisers. The topics and themes are always relevant, on point and designed to give me practical information about real-time industry issues. I look forward to all of the World Trademark Review events and highly recommend them to my industry colleagues.

Jennifer Chung
Assistant general counsel
Time Inc


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article