The Supreme Court of Canada has issued a landmark decision in Google, Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc (2017 SCC 34), confirming that Canadian courts have jurisdiction to issue interlocutory injunctions against a party’s activities that extend beyond Canada and have global reach. The court noted that the “Internet has no borders – its natural habitat is global” and, as a consequence, found that any remedy also needs to be global. In the majority opinion, Google was the “determinative player in allowing the harm [to Equustek] to occur”. Further, and in comparison, the harm to Google would be “minimal to non-existent”. The court saw the injunction as the “only effective way to mitigate the harm to Equustek”.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is simply the first resource I will go to for trademark-related information, whether about the latest trademark law development or case news, top trademark practitioners or interesting trademark events.

Jerry F Xia
Deputy general counsel and chief IP counsel – Asia-Pacific, corporate law department


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article