In this decision of the hearing officer, an application to register a three-dimensional (3D) shape was rejected on the basis of the shape's technical function (Decision O/203/18, in the matter of application No 3158606 by Hambleside Danelaw Law). The hearing officer rejected the applicant's arguments that one type of use of the shape made certain features of the shape aesthetic rather than technical.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.

Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article