Penalty against Overstock’s false advertising affirmed on appeal 24 Jul 17
In the 2013 case The People v Overstock the district attorney offices of a number of counties in California (‘the People’) alleged unfair business practices and false advertising by Overstock.Com, Inc. The claims stemmed from Overstock’s comparative price advertising on its website product pages. The trial court which ruled in favour of the People granted injunctive relief and imposed $6,828,000 in civil penalties against Overstock. Overstock appealed but the California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s ruling (People v Overstock.Com, Inc, (June 2 2017), as modified (June 23 2017)).
This legal update is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
“An excellent source of trademark news. I find the short daily updates the perfect way to keep informed of the latest developments from around the world. I thoroughly recommend it to everybody working with trademarks”
Ablett & Stebbing Patent & Trademark Attorneys
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.
Register for more free content
- Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
- Receive the editor's weekly review by email