In 2014 Xiaomi Inc applied to register the EU trademark MI PAD for goods in Class 9 and services in Class 38. Apple Inc opposed the application on the grounds of a likelihood of confusion with its earlier IPAD mark in Classes 9 and 38. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Opposition Division upheld the opposition and its decision was confirmed by the EUIPO First Board of Appeal. Following recourse action by Xiaomi, the case was brought before the EU General Court (Case T-893/16).

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is simply the first resource I will go to for trademark-related information, whether about the latest trademark law development or case news, top trademark practitioners or interesting trademark events.

Jerry F Xia
Deputy general counsel and chief IP counsel – Asia-Pacific, corporate law department
Honeywell

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article