In Estée Lauder Cosmetics Ltd v Loveless, the Federal Court of Canada considered the issue of when, and to what extent, the provision of sample goods (as opposed to the actual sale of goods) constitutes use of a trademark in association with those goods. The case resulted from an appeal against a decision by the registrar of trademarks in a summary cancellation proceeding to expunge a registration owned by Estée Lauder for the ENLIGHTEN mark, for use in association with “face makeup”.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is simply the first resource I will go to for trademark-related information, whether about the latest trademark law development or case news, top trademark practitioners or interesting trademark events.

Jerry F Xia
Deputy general counsel and chief IP counsel – Asia-Pacific, corporate law department


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article