In Royal Crown Company Inc v The Coca-Cola Company (Appeal No 2016-2375, 20 June 2018) (precedential), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) vacated the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)'s decision of 23 May 2016, in which the TTAB found that the opposers had failed to prove that ZERO is generic for soft drinks and sports drinks. The TTAB also found that applicant Coca-Cola had established acquired distinctiveness in ZERO for soft drinks. The appellate court, however, ruled that the TTAB had "erred in its legal framing" of the genericness issue and in failing to assess the level of descriptiveness of ZERO.   

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is one of my favourite conference organisers. The topics and themes are always relevant, on point and designed to give me practical information about real-time industry issues. I look forward to all of the World Trademark Review events and highly recommend them to my industry colleagues.

Jennifer Chung
Assistant general counsel
Time Inc


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article