While Chinese courts have made significant progress in improving the quality of their rulings, and full credit must be given to the many steps taken by the courts to deal with the problem of inconsistency between judgments and the application of the law, decisions surrounding Article 10(1)(8) of the Trademark Law remain a puzzle that vexes practitioners attempting to understand the scope of its application.

This part of the website has now moved to the subscriber area. To read more, please pick an option below.

Register to access two articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

The searchable online World Trademark Review database is a valuable research tool.


IP director
Maus Frères/Lacoste

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article