While Chinese courts have made significant progress in improving the quality of their rulings, and full credit must be given to the many steps taken by the courts to deal with the problem of inconsistency between judgments and the application of the law, decisions surrounding Article 10(1)(8) of the Trademark Law remain a puzzle that vexes practitioners attempting to understand the scope of its application.

This legal update is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is a fantastic tool for IP professionals to keep current with the latest case law, innovations and trends in intellectual property.  Even though my workload is time consuming, I always make time to read and digest the World Trademark Review articles and updates. The information provided is not only timely and relevant, but thoughtfully written to engage even those who might not specialise in intellectual property.

Lauren A Dienes-Middlen
Senior vice president, assistant general counsel – intellectual property, business and legal affairs
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Share this article