Thompson Compumark 2016

Legal updates

12 Feb 2016

General Court leaves no stone unturned

European Union - The General Court of the European Union has dismissed an appeal against a previous decision of the OHIM Second Board of Appeal and confirmed that the figurative mark AEROSTONE and the word mark STONE were similar, and that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks. Read update

12 Feb 2016

Supreme Court affirms refusal of registration to stylised mark due to likelihood of confusion

Israel - The Supreme Court has refused leave to appeal a district court ruling which overturned a Israel Patent and Trademark Office decision to register the stylised mark SONICGEAR notwithstanding the opposition by Sony Corporation. Read update

11 Feb 2016

Federal Court weighs in on discretionary power to cancel trademark registration

Australia - In a recent case the Federal Court of Australia considered and dealt with submissions concerning the proper exercise of the court’s discretionary power to cancel the registration of a trademark under Section 88 of the Trademarks Act 1995 (Cth). Read update

11 Feb 2016

GrillSeason succeeds on appeal following refusal of GRILLCUBE

Estonia - The Board of Appeal has overturned an Estonian Patent Office decision finding that the mark GRILLCUBE was descriptive and lacked distinctive character. The Board of Appeal found that for a refusal, the meaning of the mark should describe some essential characteristics of the goods. Read update

10 Feb 2016

Complaint for three-letter domain fails

International - A recent UDRP decision highlights that the omission of evidence will not be viewed lightly and could lead to a finding of reverse domain name hijacking, even if the respondent does not actually request this. It further demonstrates that it may also be extremely difficult to prove that a respondent was targeting a particular trademark owner when a domain name is very short. Read update

10 Feb 2016

No break for Nestlé as high threshold is confirmed for proving acquired distinctiveness

United Kingdom - In Nestlé v Cadbury the High Court dismissed Nestlé’s appeal against the registrar of trademarks’ refusal to register the shape of a Kit Kat chocolate bar following an analysis of the European Court of Justice ruling on the applicable test for proving acquired distinctiveness. Read update


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 59