Forum shopping just got easier – but beware potential traps
Recent case law signals a paradigm shift which might give parties seizing jurisdiction more flexibility. However, claimants should take account of factors beyond efficiency, cost and claimant-friendliness when selecting a forum
The term ‘forumshopping’ is generally understood as the practice of attempting to have a dispute adjudicated in a court that is thought most likely to provide a favourable decision or other advantages to the claimant. Factors that might potentially deliver such benefits to a claimant may cause significant disadvantages to the defendant – this asymmetry can prompt parties into making rush decisions in the race to seize the court of their choice. It is therefore hardly surprising that the EU Trademark Regulation (2017/1001) sets out clear rules on the international jurisdiction of EU trademark courts, which are designed to discourage forum shopping. The EU Community Designs Regulation (6/2002) goes even further, with Recital 30 expressly calling for a litigation system which “should avoid as far as possible forum shopping”.
This part of the website has now moved to the subscriber area. To read more, please pick an option below.
Register to access two articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
I look forward to reading the World Trademark Review e-mail updates every day. WTR provides a concise summary of noteworthy disputes and legislative issues around the world, as well as helpful country-specific overviews on trademark laws and practices.
Ruby A. Zefo
Director, Trademarks & Brands Legal
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.