Forum shopping just got easier – but beware potential traps
Recent case law signals a paradigm shift which might give parties seizing jurisdiction more flexibility. However, claimants should take account of factors beyond efficiency, cost and claimant-friendliness when selecting a forum
The term ‘forumshopping’ is generally understood as the practice of attempting to have a dispute adjudicated in a court that is thought most likely to provide a favourable decision or other advantages to the claimant. Factors that might potentially deliver such benefits to a claimant may cause significant disadvantages to the defendant – this asymmetry can prompt parties into making rush decisions in the race to seize the court of their choice. It is therefore hardly surprising that the EU Trademark Regulation (2017/1001) sets out clear rules on the international jurisdiction of EU trademark courts, which are designed to discourage forum shopping. The EU Community Designs Regulation (6/2002) goes even further, with Recital 30 expressly calling for a litigation system which “should avoid as far as possible forum shopping”.
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.
Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.