Trademark renewal risks: lessons on declarations of continued use and fraud claims

By Perry J Viscounty, Jennifer L Barry, David D Troutman and Patrick C Justman

As In Re Bose Corp and its progeny have illustrated, trademark owners cannot assume that a registration should or will be renewed in its original form and scope as a matter of course

Rights holders might assume that the trademark renewal process will be simple and automatic. However, In Re Bose Corp and its progeny demonstrate that the path to renewal can be fraught with unexpected intricacies and risks. This article highlights principles to help rights holders navigate the potential pitfalls of the renewal process and offers insights about Bose’s difficulties with keeping its trademark registrations and technology current.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.

Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 72