Adding substantial value to shapes – why this absolute ground should be abolished
The difficulties of protecting shapes and product designs as three-dimensional trademarks have been widely chronicled. However, the latest changes to the EU Community Trademark Regulation only extend the existing uncertainty with regard to absolute grounds for refusal
The difficulties of protecting shapes and product designs as three-dimensional (3D) trademarks are widely known and have been confirmed in numerous decisions from the European Court of Justice (ECJ), which has adopted a strict interpretation of the absolute grounds for refusal set out in Article 7 of the EU Community Trademark Regulation (2015/2424).
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.
Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.