Examiners’ perspective: best practice when applying for non-traditional marks
Registering non-traditional marks in the United States presents challenges seldom encountered when registering more familiar word and symbol trademarks. Representatives from the US Patent and Trademark Office explain how to overcome some of the most common hurdles
Section 45 of the US Trademark Act (the Lanham Act) defines ‘trademarks’ to include “any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof”. Words and symbols such as logos are familiar, but what about three-dimensional (3D) shapes, colours, patterns, touch, taste, smell or sound marks? These days, the variety of devices which can function as a trademark is limited only by the ingenuity of their creators. For rights holders keen to obtain registered protection for a non-traditional mark, there are a number of mistakes to avoid.
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.
Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.