Global discovery: an international comparison
Disclosure is often one of the first steps in any IP dispute, yet the rules across different jurisdictions can be confusing, as a comparison of the regimes in England and Wales, France and the United States demonstrates
IP disputes, by their nature, tend to be complex and technical. This is exacerbated when a dispute takes place in an unfamiliar jurisdiction. Every territory is governed by its own laws and level of court involvement, all of which can vary greatly. This article examines the rules regarding the disclosure of evidence when litigating in England and Wales and how they differ from those in the United States and France. While the different disclosure rules across jurisdictions can be confusing, it is crucial to understand them at the outset of a dispute, particularly as non-compliance can lead to serious consequences such as contempt of court. We also consider the varying disclosure rules when opposing trademark applications in these different jurisdictions.
This part of the website has now moved to the subscriber area. To read more, please pick an option below.
Register to access two articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
I look forward to reading the World Trademark Review e-mail updates every day. WTR provides a concise summary of noteworthy disputes and legislative issues around the world, as well as helpful country-specific overviews on trademark laws and practices.
Ruby A. Zefo
Director, Trademarks & Brands Legal
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.