Food, Beverages & Tobacco Team of the Year: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli
In September 2015, in a much-anticipated decision, the German Federal Court of Justice found that there was no likelihood of confusion between Lindt’s gold-foil-wrapped chocolate bear and Haribo’s word mark GOLDBÄREN. “The successful completion of the Haribo v Lindt Teddy case was a highlight for our team last year,” reflects Nicholas Studler, head of intellectual property at Lindt & Sprüngli. “We are proud that our case helped to build the case law in Germany and serves as clarification for other brand owners. The key takeaway for counsel is that, in Germany, a word mark that directly describes a product (‘golden bear’) has a limited scope of protection and does not cover any kind of motive of a shape for a product (in this instance the golden Lindt Teddy bear-shaped product).”
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.
Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.