Features

Navigating the parody defence in US trademark law

By Maureen C Kassner and Laura A Genovese

The question of what constitutes an appropriate target for ridicule is, by nature, subjective. However, imitating a trademark for the purposes of humour or commentary may cross the line into an abridgement of proprietary rights

“The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.”

This part of the website has now moved to the subscriber area. To read more, please pick an option below.

Register to access two articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

“An excellent source of trademark news. I find the short daily updates the perfect way to keep informed of the latest developments from around the world. I thoroughly recommend it to everybody working with trademarks”

Steven Suer
Partner
Ablett & Stebbing Patent & Trademark Attorneys

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Close

Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 71