Preliminary injunctions – the end of the matter or just the beginning?

By Jane Shay Wald

While preliminary injunctions are meant to act as an emergency measure to preserve the status quo until a full trial, there are good reasons why many signal not only the start, but also the end of a trademark case

The point of a preliminary injunction in a trademark case is supposedly to preserve the status quo on a highly expedited basis, in advance of the full trial on the merits which – in theory – will follow. But will it? Not usually. The preliminary injunction is typically both the beginning and the end of the trademark case – not because of any arcane legal principle, but because of common sense.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is one of my favourite conference organisers. The topics and themes are always relevant, on point and designed to give me practical information about real-time industry issues. I look forward to all of the World Trademark Review events and highly recommend them to my industry colleagues.

Jennifer Chung
Assistant general counsel
Time Inc


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 74