Preliminary injunctions – the end of the matter or just the beginning?

By Jane Shay Wald

While preliminary injunctions are meant to act as an emergency measure to preserve the status quo until a full trial, there are good reasons why many signal not only the start, but also the end of a trademark case

The point of a preliminary injunction in a trademark case is supposedly to preserve the status quo on a highly expedited basis, in advance of the full trial on the merits which – in theory – will follow. But will it? Not usually. The preliminary injunction is typically both the beginning and the end of the trademark case – not because of any arcane legal principle, but because of common sense.

This part of the website has now moved to the subscriber area. To read more, please pick an option below.

Register to access two articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is a fantastic tool for IP professionals to keep current with the latest case law, innovations and trends in intellectual property.  Even though my workload is time consuming, I always make time to read and digest the World Trademark Review articles and updates. The information provided is not only timely and relevant, but thoughtfully written to engage even those who might not specialise in intellectual property.

Lauren A Dienes-Middlen
Senior vice president, assistant general counsel – intellectual property, business and legal affairs
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 71