Pay to play – why the USPTO is steering applicants away from federal district court

By H David Starr and Howard W Kline

While recent cost-cutting initiatives may be behind the US Patent and Trademark Office actively steering ex parte appeals of dissatisfied applicants away from federal district court, where does this leave those who are still pursuing a registration?

The Lanham Act provides dissatisfied trademark applicants with the choice of appealing an ex parte ruling issued by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (15 USC §1071(a)(1)) or commencing a de novo action in federal district court (§1071(b)(1)). Historically, commencing a de novo action would be considered the prudent move for an applicant looking to conduct further discovery and submit additional testimony and other new evidence.

This article is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

I look forward to reading the World Trademark Review e-mail updates every day. WTR provides a concise summary of noteworthy disputes and legislative issues around the world, as well as helpful country-specific overviews on trademark laws and practices.

Ruby A. Zefo
Director, Trademarks & Brands Legal
Intel Corporation


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 70