Accounting for trademarks – indefiniteness is no more than an interim solution
While valuators tend to describe trademarks as having an indefinite life, this is seldom the case. However, there are various ways to estimate a mark’s remaining useful life, which can be beneficial for accounting
The value of an intangible asset is based on its useful life, among other factors, such as its ability to generate cash inflow and risk. For trademarks, valuators regularly opt for an indefinite life when there are no obvious factors to limit the mark’s future economic life. However, almost all brands are finite and only a small proportion have the potential to last for a hundred years or more. Assuming indefiniteness can have two serious effects – one relating to value and one to accounting. This article discusses such effects and suggests some guidelines and tools to analyse the lifecycle of a brand and to estimate its remaining useful life (RUL). It also presents new research that examines indefinite-lived trademarks in European jurisdictions and traces their reporting over the past 10 years.
This article is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review is simply the first resource I will go to for trademark-related information, whether about the latest trademark law development or case news, top trademark practitioners or interesting trademark events.
Jerry F Xia
Deputy general counsel and chief IP counsel – Asia-Pacific, corporate law department
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.