Columns

Perspectives

Trademark-related quotes, opinions and observations from around the globe

This case will affect policy no matter what the decision is. Even if the circuit decides there isn’t a First Amendment right, the policy issue will have been looked at in a more sophisticated way. The previous argument had been made on a precedent [re McGinley] that may or may not have been soundly based when it was made in 1981, but there is now a very strong argument that it is not even applicable in light of changes to trademark law since then. So in a world where so many substantive rights depend on trademark registration, it’s not enough merely to say, ‘It is well established that there is no First Amendment issue.’ It has got to be addressed on a substantive level.

This article is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

"There is no doubt that World Trademark Review is an important tool for people dealing with trademark matters"

Maria de Lourdes Lopes Dias
Senior Partner
Lopes Dias & Associados

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Close

Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 71