ECJ: General Court failed to provide reasons in MAGNEXT case
In MEGA Brands International v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (Case C-182/14 P), the European Court of Justice has partially set aside a judgment of the General Court on the grounds that the finding that there was a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ marks was not sufficiently substantiated.
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.
Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.