US Supreme Court renews interest in the Lanham Act

By Anne Gilson LaLonde

In 2014 two Supreme Court opinions decided who can bring a claim for false advertising. However, it was also an important year for the First Amendment in trademark cases

The headline trademark news from 2014 was the Supreme Court’s renewed interest in the Lanham Act, with two opinions on who can bring a claim for false advertising. In non-patent cases, the Supreme Court has also influenced Lanham Act holdings, clarifying the determination of ‘exceptional’ for attorneys’ fees purposes and narrowing general jurisdiction over foreign entities. Most relevant for the day-to-day work of trademark practitioners, though, is the continued steep decline in courts’ willingness to presume irreparable harm in trademark infringement cases. In addition, the First Amendment remained an unavoidable presence this past year.

Want to read more?

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is simply the first resource I will go to for trademark-related information, whether about the latest trademark law development or case news, top trademark practitioners or interesting trademark events.

Jerry F Xia
Deputy general counsel and chief IP counsel – Asia-Pacific, corporate law department


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 73