Interflora faces fresh call to prove M&S keyword infringement

By Clare Jackman and Lale Kemal

As the Court of Appeal orders Interflora back to the High Court, there are fresh questions over keyword advertising and what exactly constitutes infringement

Interflora brought an action against Marks & Spencers (M&S) due to the retailer’s identical use of its well-known INTERFLORA UK and Community trademarks. The High Court previously ruled in favour of Interflora, but in November M&S appealed and the case has now been remitted back to the High Court.

This article is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.

Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.

Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm


Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?


Register for more free content

  • Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
  • Receive the editor's weekly review by email
Register now  
Issue 71