From narrow to broad: significant change for ‘interested parties’
A new Supreme People’s Court ruling offers a much broader interpretation of the term ‘interested party’ and could allow more parties related to trademark owners to bring cancellation actions.
The Supreme People’s Court has issued its judgment on a retrial concerning Trademark Registration 3060409, ‘采埃孚’ (ZF in Chinese), in ZF Lenksysteme GmbH v Trademark Review and Adjudication Board. The Supreme People’s Court finally ruled that the disputed mark infringed the prior rights of ZF GmbH and its Chinese-related companies in the trade name ‘采埃孚’, thus violating Article 31 of the Trademark Law. Further, it revoked the judgments of the courts of first and second instance and the decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.
This article is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review is one of my favourite conference organisers. The topics and themes are always relevant, on point and designed to give me practical information about real-time industry issues. I look forward to all of the World Trademark Review events and highly recommend them to my industry colleagues.
Assistant general counsel
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.