The results are in on the ITC
The US International Trade Commission is a powerful and cost-effective weapon in the ongoing brand protection war, but remains underused.
The US International Trade Commission (ITC) investigates imports connected with unfair acts such as IP infringement and directs US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to exclude those products from the United States. In 2012 around 75% of all exclusions by the CBP resulted from ITC investigations into brand protection claims sought by Crocs, Inc (for its foam footwear) and Philip Morris (for counterfeit cigarettes). That figure is remarkable on its own, and even more so in light of the fact that brand protection claims comprise only a small fraction of ITC investigations. Naturally, this begs the question of why more companies do not use the ITC as a weapon in the brand protection war.
This article is part of World Trademark Review's premium intelligence and is only available to subscribers.
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review is a fantastic tool for IP professionals to keep current with the latest case law, innovations and trends in intellectual property. Even though my workload is time consuming, I always make time to read and digest the World Trademark Review articles and updates. The information provided is not only timely and relevant, but thoughtfully written to engage even those who might not specialise in intellectual property.
Lauren A Dienes-Middlen
Senior vice president, assistant general counsel – intellectual property, business and legal affairs
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.