Penalty against Overstock’s false advertising affirmed on appeal
In the 2013 case The People v Overstock the district attorney offices of a number of counties in California (‘the People’) alleged unfair business practices and false advertising by Overstock.Com, Inc. The claims stemmed from Overstock’s comparative price advertising on its website product pages. The trial court which ruled in favour of the People granted injunctive relief and imposed $6,828,000 in civil penalties against Overstock. Overstock appealed but the California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s ruling (People v Overstock.Com, Inc, (June 2 2017), as modified (June 23 2017)).
Want to read more?
Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month
Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts
What our customers are saying
World Trademark Review, and particularly the WTR 1000, are always very useful sources for obtaining impressions and detailed information about foreign colleagues, law firms and jurisdictions. Our whole trademark team benefits from articles published in World Trademark Review.
Christian R Thomas
Attorney at law, legal and trademark department
KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm
Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.
Register for more free content
- Read more World Trademark Review blogs and articles
- Receive the editor's weekly review by email