The controversy over the African Intellectual Property Organisation’s (OAPI) recent accession to the Madrid Protocol continues to develop, with the group of agents who claim accession is illegal calling on INTA for support. However, the association has told World Trademark Review that  it is not in a position to become involved in the legality of a country’s or intergovernmental organisation’s accession to the Madrid Protocol.

This part of the website has now moved to the subscriber area. To read more, please pick an option below.

Register to access two articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

Already registered? Log in

What our customers are saying

World Trademark Review is a fantastic tool for IP professionals to keep current with the latest case law, innovations and trends in intellectual property.  Even though my workload is time consuming, I always make time to read and digest the World Trademark Review articles and updates. The information provided is not only timely and relevant, but thoughtfully written to engage even those who might not specialise in intellectual property.

Lauren A Dienes-Middlen
Senior vice president, assistant general counsel – intellectual property, business and legal affairs
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence, insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Why subscribe?

Comments

Please log in or register to leave a comment.

RE: INTA offers assistance to OAPI as anti-Madrid agents decry lack of support

Interestingly no one remembers that the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks is affiliated to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks (1979). As we use "protocol", "agreement", "convention" or "treaty", one can easily assume they are the same entity in international law but with different names. That is quite a lack of knowledge in international law, as they are distinct in objectives and well as in substance. Apparently I do not see any impediment for any entity joining a Protocol, but I would be very surprised if an entity ( private or not), which does not translate in sovereignty as a State, signing and ratifying a treaty.

Ana Penteado, on 28 May 2015 @ 14:25

Share this article